In Focus on the Family’s latest CitizenUpdate e-mail newsletter, there has been a slight but I think significant shift in their verbiage dealing with gay-marriage. I’m sure the shift in wording is only for Massachusetts because polls have show that a slight majority is in favor of at least civil-unions, with all the rights and responsibilities of straight-marriage, or actual gay-marriage. If a majority of people support the Supreme Judicial Courts ruling, they have to change the way the present their message.<\/p>\n
\n“Coalition Launched to Defend Marriage in Massachusetts
\nOrganizations from across Massachusetts and the nation,
\nincluding Focus on the Family, have joined forces to
\nadvocate for the unique value of one-man, one-woman
\nmarriage<\/i> in the Commonwealth.” (emphasis mine)<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThey are now emphasizing the “unique value” of straight-marriage, rather than their far more harsh, exclusive, and demeaning demand that we all accept the depravity and socially-destructive idea of gay-marriage.
\ncomments? e-mail me<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In Focus on the Family’s latest CitizenUpdate e-mail newsletter, there has been a slight but I think significant shift in their verbiage dealing with gay-marriage. I’m sure the shift in wording is only for Massachusetts because polls have show that … Continue reading