{"id":147,"date":"2003-05-23T12:09:24","date_gmt":"2003-05-23T12:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/?p=147"},"modified":"2003-05-23T12:09:24","modified_gmt":"2003-05-23T12:09:24","slug":"i_have_been_reading_the","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/?p=147","title":{"rendered":"I have been reading the"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have been reading the posts from the blog <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.salon.com\/0001116\/\">Ex-Gay Watch<\/a> and following the links.  One proposition still strikes me as odd surrounding the whole gay\/ex-gay\/gay-rights argument &#8211; a common thought among many, I&#8217;m sure, but nonetheless odd.  Why do the anti-gay prohibitionists continue to relate homosexuality to nothing but behavior?  At this point in the debate it just doesn&#8217;t wash, and the anti-gay folks are simply hurting their own position in the long run by using it.  The continued use of the argument may play well to those who are ignorant (in a kind way \u00c2\u2013 simply unknowing) of the whole dynamic of homosexuality, but that ignorance is falling by the wayside.  Even sincere ex-gay ministries will not suggest that same-sex attraction (emotionally and physically) is a choice.  Besides, it is counter to the Christian ethic to continue to use an argument that one knows to be wrong and manipulative, despite the ends trying to be achieved.<br \/>\nWhether the viewpoint comes from an <a href=\"http:\/\/groups.yahoo.com\/group\/exgaydiscussionboard\/message\/3659\">African-American Christian man<\/a> who finds it completely offensive that gay-rights people couch their advocacy along the lines of civil-rights, or from a fundamentalist white mom who believes cereal commercials are advocating the gay-agenda and wonders whether to allow her children to watch TV (true!), to the guy who just doesn&#8217;t care, the determined definition of a homosexual by what is done behaviorally is ludicrous.  By definition, if sexual orientation is defined exclusively by behavior, and since they suggest that a celibate homosexual is no longer a homosexual (no behavior), then is it also true that a celibate heterosexual is no longer heterosexual?  I know, I know.<br \/>\nIt is politically expedient and very neat ideologically and theologically to demand that those who claim to be gay are homosexual only because of what they do.  It is a decision freely entered into by the homosexual.  That way, the argument of deviancy is much easier to make.  Gays should not be granted civil-rights protections, they should not be allowed to marry, and they should not be allowed to be visible because their deviancy (freely chosen behavior) is a cancer on society.<br \/>\nIt is obvious, don&#8217;t you think, to anyone wanting to know truth that a homosexual is one not because of a choice to simply engage in a behavior, but because of the same internal dynamic experienced by those who are attracted to the opposite sex.  Well, okay, it isn&#8217;t so obvious to many, and it depends on whether there is a desire to know truth.  Behavior just does not cut the mustard.  The prohibitionists are defeated if they continue down this road.  But, they have God on their side, right?<br \/>\ncomments?  <a href=\"mailto:bob@hypersync.net\" title=\"e-mail me\">e-mail me<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have been reading the posts from the blog Ex-Gay Watch and following the links. One proposition still strikes me as odd surrounding the whole gay\/ex-gay\/gay-rights argument &#8211; a common thought among many, I&#8217;m sure, but nonetheless odd. Why do &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/?p=147\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hypersync.net\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}